Take distance learning courses in Renewable Energy and become a Clean energy specialist

  • Apply now
  • Close
    Latest Events - TERI University
    Home | Events

    Events @ TERI SAS

    Latest Events

    Management Development Programme on "Reporting Sustainability in Business"

    Venue : TERI School of Advanced Studies
    Date : 20-21 August 2018

    Summary

    Sustainability reporting is the practice adopted by organizations for measuring, communicating, and being accountable to internal and external stakeholders for organizational performance towards the goal of sustainable development. "Sustainability reporting" is a broad term considered synonymous with others used to describe reporting on economic, environmental, and social impacts (e.g., triple bottom line, corporate responsibility reporting, etc.). As the stakeholders like government agencies, employees, investors, financial institutions, community, NGOs, consumers, etc., have become more demanding and demand for companies to disclose information on its social, environmental, and economic impacts is growing , it has become necessary for the companies to communicate and engage with all these stakeholders in the decision-process and hence sustainability reporting has emerged to be an important tool for stakeholder engagement and communication.

    This MDP is for Chief Sustainability Officers, CSR Heads, Finance Heads, and Strategic Planners, Analysts, Auditors, Asset Managers, and Consultants, Health/Safety/Environment Managers/ Human Resources, Corporate Communications, Public Relations, and HR Managers, Managers in IT/ Legal/Marketing/Operations/ Supply Chain

    A set of five modules will be covered during the two-day programme. Through case studies and other practical exercise, this MDP aims to equip the participants with the sustainability standards, reporting formats, and the practices of Indian firms. The pedagogy consists of experience sharing by corporates who are already engaged in preparing sustainability reports, case discussion on international sustainability reporting stories, and lectures by in-house faculty. The participants will get hands-on experience of working with various tools and techniques, such as stakeholder engagement, indicator development, and reporting.

    For more information please click here
     

    Management Development Programme on "Gender, Equity and Water Management"

    Venue : Hyderabad
    Date : 22-23 August 2018

    Summary

    Gender mainstreaming has been part of the international discourse on Integrated Water Resource Management for many years. There have been several efforts and initiatives in making the water sector both more gender balanced and gender sensitive. However, critical challenges still remain to be addressed.

    This programme develops a good conceptual and theoretical understanding of gender, rights and equity issues among participants while providing them with exposure to the practical challenges in making the water sector more gender balanced and gender sensitive. The programme also aims to build capacities of participants with respect to gender equity by suggesting practical strategies to enable them to work for sustainable and gender sensitive management of water resources. The overall objective is to make the participants better informed and motivated to make changes within their overall sphere of influence as well as to emerge as stronger advocates for gender equity at a personal level.

    The programme comprises two days of intensive sessions. The pedagogy comprises lectures, case studies, short films, and group work to facilitate cross-learning and synthesis.

    For more information please click here
     

    Search(By Title)    Order   Display #  
    Date Event Title Venue
    18 June 2018 Management Development Programme on "Water Audit a... Hyderabad
    7 May 2018 Management Development Programme - Smart Supply Ch... TERI School of Advanced Studies
    12 April 2018 National Seminar on Poverty and Social Exclusion: ... IIPA Campus, Indraprastha Estate
    10 April 2018 Conference on "Reducing Inequalities in India by 2... TERI School of Advanced Studies
    5 April 2018 Economics Seminar Series--Seminar #4 "Towards an E... L103, TERI School of Advanced Studies
     

    Economics Seminar Series-Seminar: "Three Decades of Multilateralism: Rise of Domestic Regulation as a Major Determinant of International Trade"

    Venue : L-103, TERI University
    Start Date : 17 August 2017
    End Date : 17 August 2017

    Summary

    For the purposes of achieving effective market access, this note traces the urgent need for the negotiators to shift their focus away from 'border'measures like the tariffs to 'behind-the-border'measures like the domestic regulations. The efforts by Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and the World Trade Organisation (WTO) who seeks to increase the developing and LDCs participation in the international standards setting bodies, to enhance trade in food and feed (FAO & WTO, 2017).


    In this context, let us explore the realities of market access, this note will trace this issue in some detail.


    The WTO began with the task of disciplining two variables, identified as prominent barriers to international trade - the tariffs and the non-tariff measures (NTMs). The initial years of the WTO negotiation were spent in disciplining and liberalising tariff. These were achieved through country specific disciplines like the ceiling binding commitments and MFN applied tariffs. These efforts accelerated the process of lowering tariff barriers considerably at the same time the efforts to discipline NTMs were found wanting.
    Today there is a growing body of theoretical, empirical and policy analysis, including the WTO’s 2005 World Trade Report, which recognises the technical regulations, standards and procedures for determining conformity can have both positive and detrimental effects on competition and international trade. Further this standard becomes the basic requirement for success of exports of a country (WTO 2016). Both the developed and developing countries indicate these requirements are often leading to increased costs and therefore are of greater concern to exporters and governments when compared with other forms of non-tariff measures.


    The non-price based measures like regulations and technical standards in the form of sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) and technical barriers to trade (TBT) are increasingly limiting market access and creating oligarchic industrial structures in the international trading regime. The domestic regulations and standards have recorded a rise and there is considerable literature to suggest this phenomenon.


    Leading the pack is the European Union with series of legislations regulating the use of chemicals and other substances. The EC regulations which were notified to the WTO, like supplier declaration of conformity (S-DoC); registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH); classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) and some of other notifications of 2016 restricting 588 endocrine disruptors substances and agrochemicals like Beta-Cypermethrin and Tricyclazole (WTO, 2017). Increasingly they are being challenged by the other WTO member countries for possible violation of Article 5 of SPS agreement.


    One such SPS barrier is the imposition of maximum residue limit (MRL) a mandatory SPS standard on food and feed products. These MRL standards are harmonised at the Codex alimentarius, an intergovernmental standardising body identified under the SPS Agreement.


    Some of the MRL standards on active substances (agrochemicals) notified by the members can be stringent in comparison to Codex but are permitted by Article 5 of SPS agreement such measures need to be backed by either scientific justifications or risk assessment dosseir. However, the presence of non-Codex MRL standard on agrochemicals are those for which Codex does not have harmonised international standard. As there is no comparable MRL standard by the Codex so these can be questionable measures under Article 5. To the best of my understanding, this aspect of MRL standards has never been highlighted and not discussed in the literature.


    As a researcher, I think there should be more clarity in the understanding of SPS-based MRL standards in its totality. This would be completely new phenomenon and would lead in supporting the cause of information asymmetry. This note attempts to highlight the importance of symmetry of information and the need for transparency in notifications. Further it suggests the need to put disciplines similar to that seen in case of tariff negotiations from 1995 onwards and similar efforts to be put in place for handling the barrier like the NTMs.



    Submit your Enquiry